Journal of the neurological sciences · 2020
Can the radiological scale "iNPH Radscale" predict tap test response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Laticevschi Tiberiu, Lingenberg Alma, Armand Stéphane, Griffa Alessandra, Assal Frédéric, Allali Gilles
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) presents typical radiological signs that have been summarised in a semi-quantitative scale named the iNPH Radscale. However, the iNPH Radscale's predictive value for response to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test has never been studied. This study aims to investigate if the iNPH Radscale can predict locomotion improvement after CSF tap test.
METHODS: A total of 100 patients with iNPH (age: 76.3 ± 7.9, gender: 36% female) were included in this retrospective study. Two raters, blinded to the response of the CSF tap test, evaluated the iNPH Radscale and its seven subitems (Evan's index, callosal angle, size of temporal horns, narrow high-convexity sulci, dilated Sylvian fissures, focally dilated sulci, and periventricular hypodensities). Locomotion improvement was assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) performed before, and 24 h after, the CSF tap test.
RESULTS: The iNPH Radscale (total score) was similar between the CSF tap test responders and non-responders (responders: 8.31 ± 1.96, non-responders: 9.18 ± 2.51, p = 0.128). However, the temporal horns score was smaller in the responders group (1.66 ± 0.57 versus 1.94 ± 0.24, p = 0.045), even after adjusting for age, gender, education level, white matter changes, and global cognition (β: -0.250, C.I. 95%: [-3.185; -0.161], p = 0.031).
CONCLUSION: The iNPH Radscale (total score) does not predict locomotion improvement after CSF tap test, while a smaller temporal horns score at baseline is associated with a positive tap test responder status.
METHODS: A total of 100 patients with iNPH (age: 76.3 ± 7.9, gender: 36% female) were included in this retrospective study. Two raters, blinded to the response of the CSF tap test, evaluated the iNPH Radscale and its seven subitems (Evan's index, callosal angle, size of temporal horns, narrow high-convexity sulci, dilated Sylvian fissures, focally dilated sulci, and periventricular hypodensities). Locomotion improvement was assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) performed before, and 24 h after, the CSF tap test.
RESULTS: The iNPH Radscale (total score) was similar between the CSF tap test responders and non-responders (responders: 8.31 ± 1.96, non-responders: 9.18 ± 2.51, p = 0.128). However, the temporal horns score was smaller in the responders group (1.66 ± 0.57 versus 1.94 ± 0.24, p = 0.045), even after adjusting for age, gender, education level, white matter changes, and global cognition (β: -0.250, C.I. 95%: [-3.185; -0.161], p = 0.031).
CONCLUSION: The iNPH Radscale (total score) does not predict locomotion improvement after CSF tap test, while a smaller temporal horns score at baseline is associated with a positive tap test responder status.