Journal of gastroenterology · 2024
Optimal direct oral anticoagulant for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ono Yoshitaka, Hatta Waku, Tarasawa Kunio, Ogata Yohei, Abe Hiroko, Sato Isao, Hatayama Yutaka, Saito Masahiro, Jin Xiaoyi, Uno Kaname, Koike Tomoyuki, Imatani Akira, Hamada Shin, Fujimori Kenji, Fushimi Kiyohide, Masamune Atsushi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at high risk for developing ischemic stroke and delayed bleeding in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to identify the optimal DOAC based on both adverse events in upper gastrointestinal ESD.
METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan. We included patients on a DOAC undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD between 2012 and 2021. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke occurring after upper gastrointestinal ESD and delayed bleeding in gastroduodenal and esophageal ESD. Inverse probability weightings were applied to balance the four DOAC groups (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the outcomes.
RESULTS: We analyzed 9729 patients on a DOAC undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD. Ischemic stroke developed after upper gastrointestinal ESD in 1.4%, 0.7%, 0.6%, and 0.8% of patients taking dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively, after weighting. Rivaroxaban and apixaban showed significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke compared with dabigatran (odds ratio, 0.15 and 0.12, respectively) in standard doses. The delayed bleeding developed after gastroduodenal ESD in 7.6%, 14.6%, 19.2%, and 17.3% of patients taking each DOAC, respectively, with the lowest risk in dabigatran, followed by rivaroxaban. A similar pattern was observed in delayed bleeding in esophageal ESD (3.2%, 5.4%, 7.5%, and 5.5% in each DOAC), but with no significant results.
CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban might be an optimal DOAC for upper gastrointestinal ESD showing a lower risk for both ischemic stroke and delayed bleeding.
METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan. We included patients on a DOAC undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD between 2012 and 2021. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke occurring after upper gastrointestinal ESD and delayed bleeding in gastroduodenal and esophageal ESD. Inverse probability weightings were applied to balance the four DOAC groups (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the outcomes.
RESULTS: We analyzed 9729 patients on a DOAC undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD. Ischemic stroke developed after upper gastrointestinal ESD in 1.4%, 0.7%, 0.6%, and 0.8% of patients taking dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively, after weighting. Rivaroxaban and apixaban showed significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke compared with dabigatran (odds ratio, 0.15 and 0.12, respectively) in standard doses. The delayed bleeding developed after gastroduodenal ESD in 7.6%, 14.6%, 19.2%, and 17.3% of patients taking each DOAC, respectively, with the lowest risk in dabigatran, followed by rivaroxaban. A similar pattern was observed in delayed bleeding in esophageal ESD (3.2%, 5.4%, 7.5%, and 5.5% in each DOAC), but with no significant results.
CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban might be an optimal DOAC for upper gastrointestinal ESD showing a lower risk for both ischemic stroke and delayed bleeding.