MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/pep.0000000000000458

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2018

Power Mobility Training Methods for Children: A Systematic Review.

Kenyon Lisa K, Hostnik Lisa, McElroy Rachel, Peterson Courtney, Farris John P

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To summarize and critically appraise the existing evidence related to power mobility training methods used in research studies conducted with children 21 years or younger.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using 16 electronic databases to identify primary source quantitative studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Data extraction, determination of level of evidence, evaluation of methodological rigor, and assessment of the risk of bias were completed. The Evidence Alert Traffic Light Grading System (EATLS) was used.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were included in the review. Levels of evidence were II to V; scientific rigor scores were 2 to 7.

CONCLUSIONS

An overall Yellow EATLS level of evidence was found indicating that therapists should use caution when providing power mobility training interventions and measure outcomes related to established goals in areas such as development, functional skills, or use of a power mobility device.

Для цитирования: Kenyon Lisa K, Hostnik Lisa, McElroy Rachel, Peterson Courtney, Farris John P. Power Mobility Training Methods for Children: A Systematic Review.. Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/pep.0000000000000458.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.