Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
High-volume biopsy core involvement is not associated with failure after SBRT monotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hurwitz Joshua C, Haas Jonathan A, Santos Vianca F, Mendez Christopher, Sanchez Astrid, Deng Fang-Ming, Carpenter Todd, Huang William, Lepor Herbert, Taneja Samir, Katz Aaron, Zelefsky Michael J, Lischalk Jonathan W
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: High-volume (≥ 50 %) biopsy core involvement (HVCI) is an independent risk factor for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer by NCCN guidelines. The studies demonstrating increased recurrence in high-volume disease were conducted in an era of conventional fractionation, often without dose-escalation. In the SBRT era, we explore the value of this pathologic criteria in intermediate-risk disease.
METHODS: A large institutional database was reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with localized intermediate-risk (Gleason Grade [GG] 2 and 3) disease, who were treated with definitive five-fraction SBRT without ADT. HVCI was analyzed (1) traditionally with all positive cores given equal weight as well as weighted with a positive core of GG1 to GG3 given (2) linearly and (3) exponentially increased weight. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using Cox and linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, 888 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with five-fraction SBRT monotherapy to a median dose of 3500 cGy. The majority (68 %) had GG2 disease. HVCI was present in the 22 % and was inversely related to prostate volume and directly related to T-stage. Biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) was not significantly associated with HVCI in the cohort (p = 0.47) nor in the GG2 (p = 0.85) and GG3 (p = 0.26) sub-cohorts. Similarly, when linear or exponential weight was given to a core with higher-grade disease, there was no association with BDFS. Finally, PSA nadir was not associated with HVCI; however, time to PSA nadir (TTN) was negatively associated with HVCI in the GG3 sub-cohort (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: With a median follow-up of 4.1 years, HVCI was not associated with BDFS following SBRT monotherapy, particularly in patients with otherwise favorable intermediate-risk disease (GG2). TTN analysis suggests that HVCI may remain prognostic in GG3 disease (by definition unfavorable intermediate-risk). Further work should prospectively confirm whether HVCI is unnecessary in risk-stratifying GG2 disease in the SBRT era.
METHODS: A large institutional database was reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with localized intermediate-risk (Gleason Grade [GG] 2 and 3) disease, who were treated with definitive five-fraction SBRT without ADT. HVCI was analyzed (1) traditionally with all positive cores given equal weight as well as weighted with a positive core of GG1 to GG3 given (2) linearly and (3) exponentially increased weight. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using Cox and linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, 888 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with five-fraction SBRT monotherapy to a median dose of 3500 cGy. The majority (68 %) had GG2 disease. HVCI was present in the 22 % and was inversely related to prostate volume and directly related to T-stage. Biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) was not significantly associated with HVCI in the cohort (p = 0.47) nor in the GG2 (p = 0.85) and GG3 (p = 0.26) sub-cohorts. Similarly, when linear or exponential weight was given to a core with higher-grade disease, there was no association with BDFS. Finally, PSA nadir was not associated with HVCI; however, time to PSA nadir (TTN) was negatively associated with HVCI in the GG3 sub-cohort (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: With a median follow-up of 4.1 years, HVCI was not associated with BDFS following SBRT monotherapy, particularly in patients with otherwise favorable intermediate-risk disease (GG2). TTN analysis suggests that HVCI may remain prognostic in GG3 disease (by definition unfavorable intermediate-risk). Further work should prospectively confirm whether HVCI is unnecessary in risk-stratifying GG2 disease in the SBRT era.