Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2006
Brain imaging in psychiatry - a study of 435 psychiatric in-patients at a university clinic.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mueller C, Rufer M, Moergeli H, Bridler R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The use of brain imaging in psychiatry still lacks clear guidelines. We investigated the referral practice, outcome and predictive factors of neuroimaging in a Swiss psychiatric university clinic.
METHOD: Medical files were reviewed retrospectively for 435 consecutively hospitalized patients who were subjected to neuroimaging. The association between the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and the scan results was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Of overall examinations, 69.4% were normal, 16.3% equivocal and 14.3% abnormal; 2.9% of scans ordered for screening only showed pathology. Neurologic signs and advanced age of patients predicted abnormal scan findings, whereas other variables such as EEG results showed no significant association.
CONCLUSION: Our results support the need for clear indications for using brain imaging in psychiatric in-patients. Focal neurologic signs and advanced patient age seems to predict abnormal scan results. However, these criteria are not sufficiently sensitive to predict significant scan findings in all patients.
METHOD: Medical files were reviewed retrospectively for 435 consecutively hospitalized patients who were subjected to neuroimaging. The association between the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and the scan results was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Of overall examinations, 69.4% were normal, 16.3% equivocal and 14.3% abnormal; 2.9% of scans ordered for screening only showed pathology. Neurologic signs and advanced age of patients predicted abnormal scan findings, whereas other variables such as EEG results showed no significant association.
CONCLUSION: Our results support the need for clear indications for using brain imaging in psychiatric in-patients. Focal neurologic signs and advanced patient age seems to predict abnormal scan results. However, these criteria are not sufficiently sensitive to predict significant scan findings in all patients.