MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 1990

Hyperthermic limb perfusion for malignant melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma.

Kettelhack C, Kraus T, Hupp T, Manner M, Schlag P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

From 1982-1989, 113 hyperthermic limb perfusions were carried out in 102 patients. Ninety-three patients were treated for malignant melanoma and nine for soft tissue sarcoma. 47/93 patients had high-risk stage I melanoma with a 5-year survival rate of 89%. For the 46 patients treated for recurrent and metastatic melanoma the projected 5-year survival rate was 40%. The nine patients with soft tissue sarcoma were perfused for local recurrences or because of anatomically difficult tumor locations. 3/9 patients subsequently developed recurrent disease of the extremity; two of these patients had to be treated by amputation. The rate of major complications was low: no patient died in the postoperative course, an amputation due to toxic reaction was never required. Erythema and oedema (57%), severe skin reaction (6%) and transient nerve palsy (15%) were common side effects of therapy. Only two cases of leucopenia were observed (2%). The favourable results after hyperthermic limb perfusion show the efficacy of this method in the treatment of malignant melanoma and selected cases of soft tissue sarcoma.

Для цитирования: Kettelhack C, Kraus T, Hupp T, Manner M, Schlag P. Hyperthermic limb perfusion for malignant melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 1990.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.