MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2408308

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2024

Left Atrial Appendage Closure after Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Wazni Oussama M, Saliba Walid I, Nair Devi G, Marijon Eloi, Schmidt Boris, Hounshell Troy, Ebelt Henning, Skurk Carsten, Oza Saumil, Patel Chinmay, Kanagasundram Arvindh, Sadhu Ashish, Sundaram Sri, Osorio Jose, Mark George, Gupta Madhukar, DeLurgio David B, Olson Jeffrey, Nielsen-Kudsk Jens Erik, Boersma Lucas V A, Healey Jeff S, Phillips Karen P, Asch Federico M, Wolski Katherine, Roy Kristine, Christen Thomas, Sutton Brad S, Stein Kenneth M, Reddy Vivek Y, OPTION Trial Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеEquivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulation is recommended after ablation for atrial fibrillation among patients at high risk for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure is a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation, but data regarding its use after atrial fibrillation ablation are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted an international randomized trial involving 1600 patients with atrial fibrillation who had an elevated score (≥2 in men and ≥3 in women) on the CHA2DS2-VASc scale (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) and who underwent catheter ablation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo left atrial appendage closure or receive oral anticoagulation. The primary safety end point, tested for superiority, was non-procedure-related major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. The primary efficacy end point, tested for noninferiority, was a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. The secondary end point, tested for noninferiority, was major bleeding, including procedure-related bleeding, through 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 803 patients were assigned to undergo left atrial appendage closure, and 797 to receive anticoagulant therapy. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 69.6±7.7 years, 34.1% of the patients were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.5±1.3. At 36 months, a primary safety end-point event had occurred in 65 patients (8.5%) in the left atrial appendage closure group (device group) and in 137 patients (18.1%) in the anticoagulation group (P<0.001 for superiority); a primary efficacy end-point event had occurred in 41 patients (5.3%) and 44 patients (5.8%), respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority); and a secondary end-point event had occurred in 3.9% and 5.0% (P<0.001 for noninferiority). Complications related to the appendage closure device or procedure occurred in 23 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who underwent catheter-based atrial fibrillation ablation, left atrial appendage closure was associated with a lower risk of non-procedure-related major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding than oral anticoagulation and was noninferior to oral anticoagulation with respect to a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. (Funded by Boston Scientific; OPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03795298.).

Для цитирования: Wazni Oussama M, Saliba Walid I, Nair Devi G, Marijon Eloi, Schmidt Boris, Hounshell Troy, Ebelt Henning, Skurk Carsten, Oza Saumil, Patel Chinmay, Kanagasundram Arvindh, Sadhu Ashish, Sundaram Sri, Osorio Jose, Mark George, Gupta Madhukar, DeLurgio David B, Olson Jeffrey, Nielsen-Kudsk Jens Erik, Boersma Lucas V A, Healey Jeff S, Phillips Karen P, Asch Federico M, Wolski Katherine, Roy Kristine, Christen Thomas, Sutton Brad S, Stein Kenneth M, Reddy Vivek Y, OPTION Trial Investigators. Left Atrial Appendage Closure after Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.. The New England journal of medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2408308.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.