The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2023
Treatment Strategy for Condyle/Ramus Deficiency Using 3D Virtual Surgery and CAD/CAM Technologies; Total Joint Replacement or Inverted-L Osteotomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maeng Ji Youn, Ha Sung-Ho, Baek Seung-Hak, Choi Jin-Young
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a guideline for selecting proper surgical modalities for correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion with moderate-to-severe vertical height deficiency (VHD) of the condyle/ramus complex (CRC) using bimaxillary surgery in conjunction with total joint replacement (TJR) or inverted-L osteotomy (ILO) assisted by 3D virtual surgical planning and CAD/CAM technologies.
CASES: Four cases of severe skeletal Class II patients with moderate-to-severe VHD of CRC were presented. They underwent bimaxillary surgery using Le Fort I osteotomy in the maxilla and TJR or ILO in the mandible, with the help of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-printed surgical guides and osteosynthesis plates. Guidelines are as follows: (1) if a patient has a moderate degree of VHD and the function of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is normal, ILO would be preferred for vertical elongation of the ramus; (2) if a patient has congenitally small condyle or severe condylar resorption, TJR would be preferred to resolve severe VHD of CRC; and (3) when a patient has a metal allergy, foreign body reaction or anatomic limitations (ie, thin cranial base cortex for fossa fixation), ILO would be a better option than TJR.
RESULTS: TJR or ILO using VSP and CAD/CAM-printed surgical guides, wafers, and customized plates can provide a proper selection of the surgical plan, accurate transfer of surgical plans to actual surgical procedures, and esthetic improvement of the facial profile.
CONCLUSION: This guideline based on the degree of VHD and functional aspects of CRC might help clinicians to select effective surgical modality for correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion with moderate-to-severe VHD of CRC.
CASES: Four cases of severe skeletal Class II patients with moderate-to-severe VHD of CRC were presented. They underwent bimaxillary surgery using Le Fort I osteotomy in the maxilla and TJR or ILO in the mandible, with the help of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-printed surgical guides and osteosynthesis plates. Guidelines are as follows: (1) if a patient has a moderate degree of VHD and the function of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is normal, ILO would be preferred for vertical elongation of the ramus; (2) if a patient has congenitally small condyle or severe condylar resorption, TJR would be preferred to resolve severe VHD of CRC; and (3) when a patient has a metal allergy, foreign body reaction or anatomic limitations (ie, thin cranial base cortex for fossa fixation), ILO would be a better option than TJR.
RESULTS: TJR or ILO using VSP and CAD/CAM-printed surgical guides, wafers, and customized plates can provide a proper selection of the surgical plan, accurate transfer of surgical plans to actual surgical procedures, and esthetic improvement of the facial profile.
CONCLUSION: This guideline based on the degree of VHD and functional aspects of CRC might help clinicians to select effective surgical modality for correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion with moderate-to-severe VHD of CRC.