Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
PCT-to-albumin ratio and CRP-to-albumin ratio as predictors of febrile neutropenia complications: a prospective observational trial.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dimitrijević Jelena, Čalamać Marina, Đurmez Ognjen, Stojanović Marko
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether procalcitonin-to-albumin ratio (PAR) and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) can be alternatives to the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score in predicting bacteriemia, septicemia, death during FN, and 28-day mortality, in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN).
METHODS: This is a prospective observational study that included 185 participants with FN. Clinical and laboratory findings like PAR and CAR were analyzed, and their ability to predict FN complications was investigated.
RESULTS: From the included population, the 91 subjects (49.46%) had low-risk FN with MASCC risk index ≥ 21. Sixteen participants (8.70%) had bacteremia, and eight developed septicemia (4.89%). Before resolving FN, 15 people died, and in total 33 died within 28 days of diagnosis. The ROC curve analysis indicates that the CAR (p = 0.0008921) better predicts mortality during FN, and the PAR (p = 0.0003535) better predicts bacteremia. Incorporating CAR values into the MASCC risk index predicts mortality by as much as 33.33% more precisely than the MASCC risk index alone. The CAR values > 2.74 were an independent predictor of 28-day mortality (OR = 3.70; 95% CI = 1.08-13.02; p = 0.0376).
CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that PAR and CAR can be leveraged as valuable prognostic tools in predicting bacteremia, septicemia, mortality during FN, and 28-day mortality in patients with FN.
METHODS: This is a prospective observational study that included 185 participants with FN. Clinical and laboratory findings like PAR and CAR were analyzed, and their ability to predict FN complications was investigated.
RESULTS: From the included population, the 91 subjects (49.46%) had low-risk FN with MASCC risk index ≥ 21. Sixteen participants (8.70%) had bacteremia, and eight developed septicemia (4.89%). Before resolving FN, 15 people died, and in total 33 died within 28 days of diagnosis. The ROC curve analysis indicates that the CAR (p = 0.0008921) better predicts mortality during FN, and the PAR (p = 0.0003535) better predicts bacteremia. Incorporating CAR values into the MASCC risk index predicts mortality by as much as 33.33% more precisely than the MASCC risk index alone. The CAR values > 2.74 were an independent predictor of 28-day mortality (OR = 3.70; 95% CI = 1.08-13.02; p = 0.0376).
CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that PAR and CAR can be leveraged as valuable prognostic tools in predicting bacteremia, septicemia, mortality during FN, and 28-day mortality in patients with FN.