Pediatric surgery international · 2010
Minimally invasive technique for the concealed penis lead to longer penile length.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Weimin, Cheng Fan, Zhang Xiaobin, Ruan Yuan, Yang Sixing, Xia Yue
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to report a simple and minimally invasive surgical technique for congenital concealed penis repair.
METHODS: Described technique includes two approaches based on common principle, which could be selected according to the degree of penis buried. Through the minimally invasive incision at the base of penis, the repair is performed combination of tacking penile base to prepubic fascia and anchoring subcutaneous penile skin to base of penile shaft. The outcome of the operation is evaluated by improvement of penile length and satisfaction of penile appearance.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference of the penile length between preoperative and postoperative was 2.6 cm for procedure I, and 2.7 cm for procedure II (P < 0.001). There were 58 parents (93.5%) satisfied with the result. No serious intraoperative or perioperative complications. Edema and swelling on the penis are common, but improves with time. All patients are followed for at least 5 months, no retractions occur in any case.
CONCLUSIONS: The described technique is simple and minimally invasive. Excellent cosmetic results are achieved with low complication rate and high parent satisfaction. In our experience, there were no additional procedures required to perform deglove or reorganization of the penile skin.
METHODS: Described technique includes two approaches based on common principle, which could be selected according to the degree of penis buried. Through the minimally invasive incision at the base of penis, the repair is performed combination of tacking penile base to prepubic fascia and anchoring subcutaneous penile skin to base of penile shaft. The outcome of the operation is evaluated by improvement of penile length and satisfaction of penile appearance.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference of the penile length between preoperative and postoperative was 2.6 cm for procedure I, and 2.7 cm for procedure II (P < 0.001). There were 58 parents (93.5%) satisfied with the result. No serious intraoperative or perioperative complications. Edema and swelling on the penis are common, but improves with time. All patients are followed for at least 5 months, no retractions occur in any case.
CONCLUSIONS: The described technique is simple and minimally invasive. Excellent cosmetic results are achieved with low complication rate and high parent satisfaction. In our experience, there were no additional procedures required to perform deglove or reorganization of the penile skin.