MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1558944718813721

Медицинская библиотека · Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2018

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Retrospective Analysis of 60 Consecutive Cases of Ambulatory Surgical Treatment With Local Anesthesia.

Chang Chia Y, Beduschi Murilo G, Pacheco Thierry A, de M Chang Clarissa C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ambulatory open surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome with local anesthesia and without tourniquet ischemia, sedation by an anesthesiologist, or hospitalization.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 60 consecutive cases performed during 1 year was conducted, excluding other compressive or noncompressive neuropathies. The criteria for treatment efficacy were improvements in symptoms and recurrence rates, and the safety criterion was the presence of complications.

Results

The mean patient age was 53.39 years, with 91.7% of women and 8.3% of men. The right side was more frequently affected (65% of the cases). The anesthetic and surgical procedures were well tolerated by patients. No complications during the procedures or postsurgical recurrences were observed.

Conclusions

Consistent with previous data, the results of this study corroborate that the proposed treatment is effective, safe, and of low cost, resulting in great savings and increased productivity for the public health system.

Для цитирования: Chang Chia Y, Beduschi Murilo G, Pacheco Thierry A, de M Chang Clarissa C. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Retrospective Analysis of 60 Consecutive Cases of Ambulatory Surgical Treatment With Local Anesthesia.. Hand (New York, N.Y.). 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718813721.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.