Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
[Clinical effect and safety of different maintenance doses of caffeine citrate in treatment of apnea in very low birth weight preterm infants: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Xiao, Zhang Hai-Tao, Lyu Yong, Wang Li-Feng, Yang Zhen-Ying
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical effect and safety of different maintenance doses of caffeine citrate in the treatment of apnea in very low birth weight preterm infants.
METHODS: A total of 78 very low birth weight preterm infants with primary apnea were enrolled who were admitted from January 2016 to January 2018. They were randomly divided into high-dose caffeine group with 38 children and low-dose caffeine group with 40 children. Both groups received a loading dose of 20 mg/kg caffeine citrate, and 24 hours later, the children in the high-dose caffeine group were given a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg, and those in the low-dose caffeine group were given a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg. The two groups were compared in terms of response rate and incidence rate of adverse events.
RESULTS: The high-dose caffeine group had a significantly higher response rate than the low-dose caffeine group (71% vs 48%; P<0.05). Compared with the low-dose caffeine group, the high-dose caffeine group had significantly shorter duration of apnea and time of caffeine treatment (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in length of hospital stay and incidence rates of tachycardia, feeding intolerance, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intracranial hemorrhage (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher maintenance dose of caffeine citrate has a better clinical effect than lower maintenance dose of caffeine citrate in the treatment of apnea in very low birth weight preterm infants, without increasing the incidence rates of adverse drug reactions and serious complications in preterm infants.
METHODS: A total of 78 very low birth weight preterm infants with primary apnea were enrolled who were admitted from January 2016 to January 2018. They were randomly divided into high-dose caffeine group with 38 children and low-dose caffeine group with 40 children. Both groups received a loading dose of 20 mg/kg caffeine citrate, and 24 hours later, the children in the high-dose caffeine group were given a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg, and those in the low-dose caffeine group were given a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg. The two groups were compared in terms of response rate and incidence rate of adverse events.
RESULTS: The high-dose caffeine group had a significantly higher response rate than the low-dose caffeine group (71% vs 48%; P<0.05). Compared with the low-dose caffeine group, the high-dose caffeine group had significantly shorter duration of apnea and time of caffeine treatment (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in length of hospital stay and incidence rates of tachycardia, feeding intolerance, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intracranial hemorrhage (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher maintenance dose of caffeine citrate has a better clinical effect than lower maintenance dose of caffeine citrate in the treatment of apnea in very low birth weight preterm infants, without increasing the incidence rates of adverse drug reactions and serious complications in preterm infants.