The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025
Genotype III-Based Japanese Encephalitis Vaccines Exhibit Diminished Neutralizing Response to Reemerging Genotype V.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Ah-Ra, Kim Woo-Jin, Choi Haeyoun, Kim Sang-Hyun, Hong Su-Yeon, Shim Sang-Mu, Lee Hee Il, Song Jae Min, Kim Seong-Jun, Ishikawa Tomohiro, Kang Ji-Man, Eom Hyeon-Seok, Seo Sang-Uk
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Japanese encephalitis (JE) has been predominantly controlled through vaccination. However, the isolation of JE virus (JEV) genotype V (GV) in China in 2009, and the subsequent alarming increase in JE cases in the Republic of Korea since 2010, present a new challenge.
METHODS: Serum samples from individuals vaccinated with genotype III (GIII)-based JE vaccines were analyzed for neutralizing seroresponse to GV isolates.
RESULTS: Serum from immunocompromised pediatric patients vaccinated with an inactivated JE vaccine showed higher 50% plaque reduction neutralization test geometric mean titer (GMT) against GIII Nakayama (11 358; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1790-29 658), but lower GMTs against GV isolates: GV Muar (499; 95% CI, 0-2437), GV 43279 (308; 95% CI, 159-582), and GV 43413 (231; 95% CI, 108-738). Similarly, 32 healthy volunteers receiving a live attenuated JE vaccine achieved 100% seroprotection against GIII Nakayama with GMT of 338 (95% CI, 304-651) at 1 month postvaccination. However, GMTs against GV isolates were 123 (95% CI, 102-446) for GV Muar, 81 (95% CI, 63-168) for GV 43279, and 107 (95% CI, 100-322) for GV 43413, not achieving 100% seroprotection against these isolates. At 6 months postvaccination, GMT against Nakayama increased to 696 (95% CI, 409-2353), while remaining similar for GV isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores that current GIII-based vaccines do not provide comparable protection against GV JEVs, impacting individuals in both current and potential endemic regions, as well as travelers to these regions.
METHODS: Serum samples from individuals vaccinated with genotype III (GIII)-based JE vaccines were analyzed for neutralizing seroresponse to GV isolates.
RESULTS: Serum from immunocompromised pediatric patients vaccinated with an inactivated JE vaccine showed higher 50% plaque reduction neutralization test geometric mean titer (GMT) against GIII Nakayama (11 358; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1790-29 658), but lower GMTs against GV isolates: GV Muar (499; 95% CI, 0-2437), GV 43279 (308; 95% CI, 159-582), and GV 43413 (231; 95% CI, 108-738). Similarly, 32 healthy volunteers receiving a live attenuated JE vaccine achieved 100% seroprotection against GIII Nakayama with GMT of 338 (95% CI, 304-651) at 1 month postvaccination. However, GMTs against GV isolates were 123 (95% CI, 102-446) for GV Muar, 81 (95% CI, 63-168) for GV 43279, and 107 (95% CI, 100-322) for GV 43413, not achieving 100% seroprotection against these isolates. At 6 months postvaccination, GMT against Nakayama increased to 696 (95% CI, 409-2353), while remaining similar for GV isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores that current GIII-based vaccines do not provide comparable protection against GV JEVs, impacting individuals in both current and potential endemic regions, as well as travelers to these regions.