MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0954579412000521

Медицинская библиотека · Development and psychopathology · 2012

Paranoid thinking, suspicion, and risk for aggression: a neurodevelopmental perspective.

Tone Erin B, Davis Jennifer S

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This article represents an effort to extend our understanding of paranoia or suspicion and its development by integrating findings across clinical, developmental, and neuroscience literatures. We first define "paranoia" or paranoid thought and examine its prevalence across typically and atypically developing individuals and theoretical perspectives regarding its development and maintenance. We then briefly summarize current ideas regarding the neural correlates of adaptive, appropriately trusting interpersonal perception, social cognition, and behavior across development. Our focus shifts subsequently to examining in normative and atypical developmental contexts the neural correlates of several component cognitive processes thought to contribute to paranoid thinking: (a) attention bias for threat, (b) jumping to conclusions biases, and (c) hostile intent attribution biases. Where possible, we also present data regarding independent links between these cognitive processes and aggressive behavior. By examining data regarding the behavioral and neural correlates of varied cognitive processes that are likely components of a paranoid thinking style, we hope to advance both theoretical and empirical research in this domain.

Для цитирования: Tone Erin B, Davis Jennifer S. Paranoid thinking, suspicion, and risk for aggression: a neurodevelopmental perspective.. Development and psychopathology. 2012. DOI: 10.1017/s0954579412000521.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.