MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/2011.11.peds11177

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics · 2012

Posterior fossa epidural hematomas in children: clinical experience with 40 cases.

Sencer Altay, Aras Yavuz, Akcakaya Mehmet Osman, Goker Burcu, Kiris Talat, Canbolat Ali Tuncay

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECT: Traumatic posterior fossa epidural hematoma (PFEDH) is rare, but among children it may have a slightly higher incidence. With the widespread use of CT scanning, the diagnosis of PFEDH can be established more accurately, leading to an increased incidence of the lesion and possibly to a better patient prognosis. This study presents 40 pediatric cases with PFEDH.

METHODS

The authors assessed the type of trauma, clinical findings on admission, Glasgow Coma Scale scores, CT findings (thickness of the hematoma, bone fracture, compression of the fourth ventricle, and ventricle enlargement), type of treatment, clinical course, and prognosis. Early postoperative CT scans (within the first 6 hours) were obtained and reviewed in all surgical cases.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery and 11 patients received conservative therapy and close follow-up. All patients fared well, and there was no surgical mortality or morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data in this large series, the authors conclude that PFEDH in children can be treated in experienced centers with excellent outcome, and there is no need to avoid surgery when it is indicated.

Для цитирования: Sencer Altay, Aras Yavuz, Akcakaya Mehmet Osman, Goker Burcu, Kiris Talat, Canbolat Ali Tuncay. Posterior fossa epidural hematomas in children: clinical experience with 40 cases.. Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.11.peds11177.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.