MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1087054716666951

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of attention disorders · 2016

Prevalence and Correlates of Self-Reported ADHD Symptoms in Children Attending School in India.

Jaisoorya T S, Beena K V, Beena M, Ellangovan K, George Sanju, Thennarasu K, Srinath Shoba

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Objective

To study the prevalence and correlates of self-reported ADHD symptoms among school-going adolescents from Kerala, India. Method: Seven thousand five hundred sixty students from Classes 8, 10, and 12, aged 12 to 19 years, across 73 schools selected by cluster random sampling, were invited to participate, but only 7,150 successfully completed the questionnaire incorporating standardized instruments.

Results

Three hundred five (4.3%) self-reported symptoms for ADHD combined type, 131 (1.8%) for ADHD hyperactive-impulsive type, and 102 (1.4%) for ADHD inattentive type with a male predominance. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that those with symptoms of ADHD (combined type) compared with the non-ADHD group had poorer academic performance, significantly higher substance use, psychological distress, suicidality, and sexual abuse.

Conclusion

The high prevalence of self-reported ADHD symptoms and its association with negative correlates previously reported in literature in those with a diagnosis of ADHD suggests that clinically significant self-reported ADHD symptoms could be as disabling as ADHD.

Для цитирования: Jaisoorya T S, Beena K V, Beena M, Ellangovan K, George Sanju, Thennarasu K, Srinath Shoba. Prevalence and Correlates of Self-Reported ADHD Symptoms in Children Attending School in India.. Journal of attention disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1087054716666951.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.