Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology · 2010
[Remifentanil provides fast recovery and hemodynamic stability in laryngomicrosurgery anesthesia].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kishi Yoshihiko, Tanigami Hironobu, Kagawa Kiyokazu, Asakura Yoshimi, Sonoda Shunji, Hiuge Yuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Stressful procedures such as intratracheal intubation and direct laryngoscopy in very short operations make anesthetic management for laryngomicrosurgery difficult. This study was conducted to evaluate which anesthetic agent, remifentanil or fentanyl, is suitable in anesthesia for laryngomicrosurgery.
METHODS: After obtaining informed consent prior to the study, 18 patients undergoing elective laryngomicrosurgery were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive remifentanil (R group) or fentanyl (F group). Patients with ages above 76 years and moderate abnormalities in cardiovascular system or respiratory system were excluded.
RESULTS: Average infusion rate of remifentanil was 0.24 +/- 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and total infused dose of fentanyl was 0.27 +/- 0.05 mg. Average bispectral index values in both groups were comparable. Cases needing sevoflurane inhalation to control blood pressure were significantly more in F group than in R group. Heart rate was significantly lower in R group than in F group. Duration from the end of operation to responses to verbal commands and extubation was significantly shorter in R group than in F group.
CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil provided faster recovery and hemodynamic stability. Therefore, remifentanil seems to be more suitable than fentanyl in anesthesia for laryngomicrosurgery.
METHODS: After obtaining informed consent prior to the study, 18 patients undergoing elective laryngomicrosurgery were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive remifentanil (R group) or fentanyl (F group). Patients with ages above 76 years and moderate abnormalities in cardiovascular system or respiratory system were excluded.
RESULTS: Average infusion rate of remifentanil was 0.24 +/- 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and total infused dose of fentanyl was 0.27 +/- 0.05 mg. Average bispectral index values in both groups were comparable. Cases needing sevoflurane inhalation to control blood pressure were significantly more in F group than in R group. Heart rate was significantly lower in R group than in F group. Duration from the end of operation to responses to verbal commands and extubation was significantly shorter in R group than in F group.
CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil provided faster recovery and hemodynamic stability. Therefore, remifentanil seems to be more suitable than fentanyl in anesthesia for laryngomicrosurgery.