MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/jwh.2016.5823

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of women's health (2002) · 2016

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Cervical Cancer Screening.

Alcalá Héctor E, Mitchell Emma, Keim-Malpass Jessica

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been associated with an increased risk of a variety of diseases, including cancer. However, research has largely ignored how ACEs impact cancer screening, a potential intermediate outcome. As such, the present study examined the association between ACEs and ever and recent use of Papanicolaou (Pap) test, among women aged 21 and older.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Analyses used the 2009 Tennessee Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 1527) to model odds of ever and recently (within the last 3 years) engaging in Pap tests screening from nine different adversities. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were run to accomplish this.

RESULTS

In bivariate and multivariate models, living in a household in which adults treated each other violently increased odds of ever receiving a Pap test. In bivariate models, physical and sexual abuse was associated with decreased odds of receiving a recent Pap test. After accounting for confounders, only the latter association remained significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight a potential mechanism by which early childhood experiences can impact the development of cervical cancer. Providers of care should consider modifications to their screening practices, including screening for child abuse, to better serve all women.

Для цитирования: Alcalá Héctor E, Mitchell Emma, Keim-Malpass Jessica. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Cervical Cancer Screening.. Journal of women's health (2002). 2016. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5823.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.