MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · International surgery · 2002

True giant common hepatic artery aneurysm associated with obstructive jaundice: a case report.

Bramis John, Felekouras Evangelos, Kontos Michael, Leonardou Politimi, Griniatsos John, Bastounis Elias

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The appropriate treatment for extrahepatic hepatic artery aneurysms remains controversial, with arguments for and against embolization. We describe a case of a giant true aneurysm of the common hepatic artery associated with obstructive jaundice of nonhemobilia origin. The patient, a 49-year-old previously healthy man, presented with upper midepigastric pain, jaundice, and low-grade fever. The diagnosis of the aneurysm was mainly based on computed tomography scan findings. The aneurysm was successfully embolized using wire coils, and the patient was operated on for acute abdomen. Necrotizing acalculus cholecystitis was found, and cholecystectomy followed by aneurysmectomy without hepatic artery reconstruction was performed. The jaundice subsided spontaneously, and the patient was discharged in good condition. Giant common hepatic artery aneurysms can be managed by either surgery or embolization. In the absence of liver ischemia there is no need for common hepatic artery reconstruction unless a bilioenteric bypass has to be performed to resolve the issue of jaundice. If the latter is required, reconstruction of the hepatic artery might be justifiable to maximize the blood supply to the bile duct.

Для цитирования: Bramis John, Felekouras Evangelos, Kontos Michael, Leonardou Politimi, Griniatsos John, Bastounis Elias. True giant common hepatic artery aneurysm associated with obstructive jaundice: a case report.. International surgery. 2002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.