MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.01.007

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric urology · 2023

Morbidity following suprapubic line insertion for videourodynamics in children.

Bhandarkar Kailas, Giannettoni Adele, Mishra Pankaj, Paul Anu, Clothier Joanna, Manuele Riccardo, Solomon Eskinder, Garriboli Massimo, Wright Anne, Taghizadeh Arash K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Previously in our unit, urodynamics were delayed after insertion of suprapubic (SP) lines. We postulated that performing urodynamics on the same day as SP line insertion would not result in increased morbidity. We retrospectively compared complications in those having urodynamics on the same day against those who had delayed urodynamics.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Notes were reviewed for patients undergoing urodynamics via SP lines from May 2009 until December 2018. In 2014 we modified our practice to allow urodynamics on the same day as SP line insertion in some patients. Patients undergoing videourodynamics would have two 5 Fr (mini Paed) SP lines inserted under general anaesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups: those that had urodynamics on the same day as SP line insertion and those that had urodynamics after an interval of more than one day. The outcome measure was the number of problems affecting those in each group. The two groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests and Fisher's Exact tests.

RESULTS

There were a total of 211 patients with a median age of 6.5 years (range three months to 15.9 years). Urodynamics were performed on the same day in 86. Delayed Urodynamics were performed at an interval of more than one day in 125. Adverse events included pain or difficulty with voiding, increased urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, leak from catheter site, extravasation, extension of in-patient stay, visible haematuria, urethral catheterisation, and urinary tract infection. Problems affected 43 (20.4%) children. In the same day group, 11 (13.3%) patients had problems, in the delayed group 32 (25.6%) had problems; this was statistically significant (p = 0.03). The difference in combined incidence of important problems (requiring urethral catheterisation, extended admission or abandonment of urodynamics) was not statistically significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

When using suprapubic catheters for urodynamics there is no additional morbidity when catheters are inserted on the same day as the urodynamics study compared to when urodynamic are delayed.

Для цитирования: Bhandarkar Kailas, Giannettoni Adele, Mishra Pankaj, Paul Anu, Clothier Joanna, Manuele Riccardo, Solomon Eskinder, Garriboli Massimo, Wright Anne, Taghizadeh Arash K. Morbidity following suprapubic line insertion for videourodynamics in children.. Journal of pediatric urology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.01.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.