Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2005
Etiology of perfusion-diffusion magnetic resonance imaging mismatch patterns.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Restrepo Lucas, Jacobs Michael A, Barker Peter B, Beauchamp Norman J, Skolasky Richard L, Keswani Sanjay C, Wityk Robert J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI and PWI) are useful tools for the assessment of brain ischemia. Discrepancies between the extent of DWI and PWI abnormalities are thought to depend pre dominantly on time from symptom onset to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. However, underlying ischemic stroke etiology can also be important. A mismatch may indicate the presence of tissue at risk for infarction, whereas the relevance of other DWI/PWI patterns is uncertain. The authors therefore investigated the etiology of brain ischemia in patients with different DWI/PWI patterns.
METHODS: Retrospective study of 130 patients with acute brain ischemia and detailed stroke workup, including MRI within a week after symptom onset (40 +/- 39 hours). Patients were divided into the following groups: mis-match (PWI > DWI), reverse mismatch (DWI > PWI), and match (<25% difference between PWI and DWI).
RESULTS: Mismatch occurred in 49% of patients, whereas 22% had reverse mis-match and 29% matched lesions. Time from symptom onset to MRI examination was similar between the 3 groups. Largeartery atherosclerosis increased by almost 4-fold the odds of mismatch (odds ratio: 3.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.72-8.78; P < .001), whereas patients with reverse mismatch were likely to have cryptogenic stroke. Patients with matched lesions were similarly distributed among different stroke subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic stroke etiology appears to influence the development of specific DWI/PWI patterns. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.
METHODS: Retrospective study of 130 patients with acute brain ischemia and detailed stroke workup, including MRI within a week after symptom onset (40 +/- 39 hours). Patients were divided into the following groups: mis-match (PWI > DWI), reverse mismatch (DWI > PWI), and match (<25% difference between PWI and DWI).
RESULTS: Mismatch occurred in 49% of patients, whereas 22% had reverse mis-match and 29% matched lesions. Time from symptom onset to MRI examination was similar between the 3 groups. Largeartery atherosclerosis increased by almost 4-fold the odds of mismatch (odds ratio: 3.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.72-8.78; P < .001), whereas patients with reverse mismatch were likely to have cryptogenic stroke. Patients with matched lesions were similarly distributed among different stroke subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic stroke etiology appears to influence the development of specific DWI/PWI patterns. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.