JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2020
Feasibility and Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Stress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pezel Théo, Sanguineti Francesca, Kinnel Marine, Landon Valentin, Toupin Solenn, Unterseeh Thierry, Louvard Yves, Champagne Stéphane, Morice Marie Claude, Hovasse Thomas, Garot Philippe, Garot Jérôme
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
BACKGROUND: Because most studies have excluded arrhythmic patients, the prognostic value of stress perfusion CMR in patients with AF is unknown.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, consecutive patients with suspected or stable chronic coronary artery disease and AF referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR were included and followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular event(s) (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The diagnosis of AF was defined by 12-lead electrocardiography before and after CMR. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR.
RESULTS: Of 639 patients (mean age 72 ± 9 years, 77% men), 602 (94%) completed the CMR protocol, and 538 (89%) completed follow-up (median 5.1 years); 80 had MACE. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of ischemia (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.86 to 11.80) or LGE (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.55 to 3.74) was associated with the occurrence of MACE (p < 0.001 for both). In a multivariate Cox regression including clinical and CMR indexes, the presence of ischemia (HR: 5.98; 95% CI: 3.68 to 9.73) or LGE (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.89 to 3.60) was an independent predictor of MACE (p < 0.001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, stress perfusion CMR is feasible and has good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE.
BACKGROUND: Because most studies have excluded arrhythmic patients, the prognostic value of stress perfusion CMR in patients with AF is unknown.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, consecutive patients with suspected or stable chronic coronary artery disease and AF referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR were included and followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular event(s) (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The diagnosis of AF was defined by 12-lead electrocardiography before and after CMR. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR.
RESULTS: Of 639 patients (mean age 72 ± 9 years, 77% men), 602 (94%) completed the CMR protocol, and 538 (89%) completed follow-up (median 5.1 years); 80 had MACE. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of ischemia (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.86 to 11.80) or LGE (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.55 to 3.74) was associated with the occurrence of MACE (p < 0.001 for both). In a multivariate Cox regression including clinical and CMR indexes, the presence of ischemia (HR: 5.98; 95% CI: 3.68 to 9.73) or LGE (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.89 to 3.60) was an independent predictor of MACE (p < 0.001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, stress perfusion CMR is feasible and has good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE.