MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13256-022-03254-5

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical case reports · 2022

Vasospasm following low-velocity penetrating pediatric intracranial trauma.

Almojuela Alysa, Kaderali Zul, McEachern James, Kazina Colin, Serletis Demitre

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

BB guns or non-powder guns created in the modern era are able to reach exceedingly fast velocities as a result of advances in compressed-gas technology. While missile penetrating trauma has been well documented in neurosurgical literature, penetrating intracranial injury secondary to non-powder guns, along with their associated complications and treatments, is not well described, and even less so in the pediatric population.

CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we describe an unusual case of a 6-year-old Indigenous child who was accidentally shot with a BB gun to the head. He subsequently developed delayed acute right-sided weakness due to symptomatic vasospasm. His symptoms resolved following hypertensive therapy, balloon angioplasty intervention, and intra-arterial milrinone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the unique complication of delayed symptomatic vasospasm in a child following a non-missile intracranial penetrating injury. Intracranial vasospasm needs to be considered in the presence of delayed neurological deficit given its potential reversibility. This case also emphasizes the importance of gun safety and education when handling and storing these potential weapons around children.

Для цитирования: Almojuela Alysa, Kaderali Zul, McEachern James, Kazina Colin, Serletis Demitre. Vasospasm following low-velocity penetrating pediatric intracranial trauma.. Journal of medical case reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-022-03254-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.