MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/ijph.ijph_37_19

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of public health · 2020

Re-exposure animal bite management among incident animal bite cases in a secondary care Hospital in Delhi, India.

Basu Saurav, Mariam Warisha, Santra Sahadev, Garg Suneela, Singhal Rajiv

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Complete postexposure prophylaxis with 4 doses of anti-rabies vaccine (ARV) in a previously vaccinated (nonnaïve) individual results in administration of two extra ARV doses resulting in wastages of precious resources comprising vaccine logistics, human resources, physician, and patient time. This cross-sectional study conducted in a secondary care hospital in Delhi among 175 incident animal bite cases observed 39 (22.3%) had an animal-bite history within the previous 5 years. A total of 19 (10.8%) cases reported a history of complete ARV vaccination during a previous animal-bite exposure. However, in the absence of supportive patient medical documentation, all the animal bite cases without exception were prescribed a full course of ARV irrespective of their previous exposure status. Rabies immunoglobulins (anti rabies serum) were also re-administered in 13 (81.2%) cases. National guidelines for rabies prophylaxis should, therefore, consider the inclusion of an explicit decision-making algorithmic mechanism when the health-care provider is confronted with this situation carrying the potential for hidden vaccine wastage.

Для цитирования: Basu Saurav, Mariam Warisha, Santra Sahadev, Garg Suneela, Singhal Rajiv. Re-exposure animal bite management among incident animal bite cases in a secondary care Hospital in Delhi, India.. Indian journal of public health. 2020. DOI: 10.4103/ijph.ijph_37_19.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.