MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1345/aph.1m344

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2010

Increased clinical failures when treating acute otitis media with macrolides: a meta-analysis.

Courter Joshua D, Baker William L, Nowak Katherine S, Smogowicz Lori A, Desjardins Lindsey L, Coleman Craig I, Girotto Jennifer E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Macrolide antibiotics are often used to treat children with acute otitis media (AOM); however, the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American Academy of Family Physicians guidelines recommend against their use in patients without history of a type I allergic reaction to penicillins.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate via meta-analysis the comparative efficacy of amoxicillin or amoxicillin/clavulanate to that of macrolide antibiotics in the treatment of children with AOM.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts was conducted from the earliest available date through September 2008. We used the following MeSH and key words: amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, Augmentin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, macrolides, AND media, otitis media, and effusion. Included studies were randomized, blinded, and controlled trials evaluating guideline-recommended antibiotics (amoxicillin or amoxicillin/clavulanate) compared to macrolide antibiotics (azithromycin or clarithromycin) in AOM in children. The primary outcome assessed was clinical failure measured between days 10 and 16 after starting antibiotic therapy. Results are reported as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals and were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 10 trials (N = 2766) evaluating children 6 months-15 years old were included in the meta-analysis. Upon meta-analysis, the use of macrolide antibiotics was associated with an increased risk of clinical failure (RR 1.31 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.60]; p = 0.008) corresponding to a number needed to harm of 32. Upon safety analysis, rates of any adverse reaction (RR 0.74 [95% CI 0.60 to 0.90]; p = 0.003) and diarrhea (RR 0.41 [95% CI 0.32 to 0.52]; p < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the macrolide group.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis suggests that patients treated with macrolides for AOM may be more likely to have clinical failures. As such, it supports the current AAP AOM recommendation that macrolides be reserved for patients who can not receive amoxicillin or amoxicillin/clavulanate.

Для цитирования: Courter Joshua D, Baker William L, Nowak Katherine S, Smogowicz Lori A, Desjardins Lindsey L, Coleman Craig I, Girotto Jennifer E. Increased clinical failures when treating acute otitis media with macrolides: a meta-analysis.. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2010. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1m344.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.