MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00464-007-9629-6

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical endoscopy · 2007

Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery.

Hogan Brian A, Winter Desmond C, Broe David, Broe Patrick, Lee Michael J

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leaks are a major complication of oesophagogastric surgery. We compare contrast swallow fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT) with oral contrast and endoscopy in identifying anastomotic leaks following oesophagogastric surgery.

METHODS

A prospective trial of 38 patients undergoing oesophagogastric resection was undertaken with informed consent and institutional review board (ethics committee) approval. Patients underwent all three investigations (over 24 hours) 1 week postoperatively.

RESULTS

Eight (21%) had clinically apparent leaks. Three pseudo-leaks were suggested on contrast swallow but were confirmed normal on CT and endoscopy. Contrast swallow and CT missed one anastomotic leak each. Endoscopy identified anastomotic defects in three patients, in whom CT and contrast swallow were either normal or conflicting.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine tests of anastomotic integrity are unnecessary. When clinically suspected, contrast swallow or CT with oral contrast will identify most leaks. Endoscopy is useful in cases where there are incongruous results.

Для цитирования: Hogan Brian A, Winter Desmond C, Broe David, Broe Patrick, Lee Michael J. Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery.. Surgical endoscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9629-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.