MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmj.m4467

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020

Toxicological analysis of George's marvellous medicine: literature review.

Johnson Graham, Davies Patrick

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the therapeutic effects and toxicity of the eponymous concoction described in Roald Dahl's book George's Marvellous Medicine.

DESIGN

Literature review.

SETTING

Two literature loving households in England.

PARTICIPANTS

George Kranky and grandma Kranky.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and toxic effects of the individual ingredients checked against those listed in ToxBase, the National Poisons Information Service's poisons database.

RESULTS

The medicine contained 34 ingredients. The most common toxic effect identified on ToxBase was nausea and vomiting (16 ingredients, 47%). Potentially life threatening effects were associated with 13 (38%) ingredients, including depression of the central nervous system, kidney injury, convulsions, cardiac toxicity, and mucosal erosion. The effects described in the book were accurate initially but then diverted from the most likely clinical outcome (death).

CONCLUSIONS

Although Dahl ought to be applauded for his initial accuracy about the toxicology of the ingredients in George's marvellous medicine, the overall effect would be fatal catastrophic physiological collapse. Scientific exploration and experimentation should be encouraged in children, although any medicinal ingredients need to be checked for potential toxicity before being administered-to grandmas or anyone else.

Для цитирования: Johnson Graham, Davies Patrick. Toxicological analysis of George's marvellous medicine: literature review.. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2020. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4467.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.