MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3201/eid1909.121855

Медицинская библиотека · Emerging infectious diseases · 2013

Acute encephalitis syndrome surveillance, Kushinagar district, Uttar Pradesh, India, 2011-2012.

Kakkar Manish, Rogawski Elizabeth T, Abbas Syed Shahid, Chaturvedi Sanjay, Dhole Tapan N, Hossain Shaikh Shah, Krishnan Sampath K

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In India, quality surveillance for acute encephalitis syndrome (AES), including laboratory testing, is necessary for understanding the epidemiology and etiology of AES, planning interventions, and developing policy. We reviewed AES surveillance data for January 2011-June 2012 from Kushinagar District, Uttar Pradesh, India. Data were cleaned, incidence was determined, and demographic characteristics of cases and data quality were analyzed. A total of 812 AES case records were identified, of which 23% had illogical entries. AES incidence was highest among boys<6 years of age, and cases peaked during monsoon season. Records for laboratory results (available for Japanese encephalitis but not AES) and vaccination history were largely incomplete, so inferences about the epidemiology and etiology of AES could not be made. The low-quality AES/Japanese encephalitis surveillance data in this area provide little evidence to support development of prevention and control measures, estimate the effect of interventions, and avoid the waste of public health resources.

Для цитирования: Kakkar Manish, Rogawski Elizabeth T, Abbas Syed Shahid, Chaturvedi Sanjay, Dhole Tapan N, Hossain Shaikh Shah, Krishnan Sampath K. Acute encephalitis syndrome surveillance, Kushinagar district, Uttar Pradesh, India, 2011-2012.. Emerging infectious diseases. 2013. DOI: 10.3201/eid1909.121855.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.