MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2015.vol29.0044

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian oral research · 2015

Down syndrome: a risk factor for malocclusion severity?

Marques Leandro Silva, Alcântara Carlos Eduardo Pinto, Pereira Luciano José, Ramos-Jorge Maria Letícia

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aims of the present study were to compare aspects related to malocclusion between individuals with Down syndrome (DS) and a control group, establish malocclusion severity, and identify determinant factors. A total of 120 individuals (60 with DS and 60 with no physical or mental impairment), were included in the study. Data were collected through interviews, analyses of the medical charts, and oral examinations. The criteria of the Dental Aesthetic Index were used for the diagnosis of malocclusion. Chi-square test (p ≤ 0.05) and multivariate logistic regression were used for comparisons between the two groups and to determine the association between the dependent (malocclusion severity) and independent variables. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for the following variables: missing teeth, diastema, overjet, mandibular protrusion, anterior open bite, posterior crossbite, facial type, lip incompetence, and Angle classification. DS, a history of premature birth, and long face pattern were found to be associated with malocclusion severity. Individuals with DS exhibited more occlusal problems than those in the control group.

Для цитирования: Marques Leandro Silva, Alcântara Carlos Eduardo Pinto, Pereira Luciano José, Ramos-Jorge Maria Letícia. Down syndrome: a risk factor for malocclusion severity?. Brazilian oral research. 2015. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2015.vol29.0044.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.