Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2014
A novel active intraoral appliance for presurgical orthopaedic treatment in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
Клинический случайОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kiya Koichiro, Oyama Tomoki, Sone Yumiko, Ishii Nobuyuki, Hosokawa Ko
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Management of the protruding/deviated premaxilla in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate is a challenging problem for surgeons and orthodontists. Various passive and active methods have been developed for the presurgical orthopaedic treatment. However, most of these treatments are complicated and laborious for the patient's parents and clinicians. Here, we describe our original active intraoral appliance comprising two components, that is, the premaxillary and palatine process plates, connected with two elastic chains, and we assess its therapeutic efficacy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 15 patients treated using this appliance during 2006-2012, followed up for an average of 60.3 months (range, 18-97 months). We analysed the cleft widths and maxillary size, obtained pretreatment, post-treatment and pre-palatoplasty.
RESULTS: Cleft widths and premaxillary protrusion were significantly decreased post treatment; however, the transverse dimensions were not significantly altered. In all cases, the protruding/deviated premaxilla was set into a suitable position within 1 month, and we could perform one-stage cheiloplasty using the modified Mulliken method with low tension.
CONCLUSION: Our appliance is technically simple to use, less invasive to the skin and bone and cost-effective, with reliable and predictable outcomes. In the follow-up period, we observed no detrimental growth of the maxilla or dentition. Therefore, we consider our appliance to be useful for application in presurgical orthopaedic treatments of complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 15 patients treated using this appliance during 2006-2012, followed up for an average of 60.3 months (range, 18-97 months). We analysed the cleft widths and maxillary size, obtained pretreatment, post-treatment and pre-palatoplasty.
RESULTS: Cleft widths and premaxillary protrusion were significantly decreased post treatment; however, the transverse dimensions were not significantly altered. In all cases, the protruding/deviated premaxilla was set into a suitable position within 1 month, and we could perform one-stage cheiloplasty using the modified Mulliken method with low tension.
CONCLUSION: Our appliance is technically simple to use, less invasive to the skin and bone and cost-effective, with reliable and predictable outcomes. In the follow-up period, we observed no detrimental growth of the maxilla or dentition. Therefore, we consider our appliance to be useful for application in presurgical orthopaedic treatments of complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.