MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/prs.0000000000000825

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2015

Comparative effectiveness studies examining patient-reported outcomes among children with cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review.

Ranganathan Kavitha, Vercler Christian J, Warschausky Seth A, MacEachern Mark P, Buchman Steven R, Waljee Jennifer F

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Health care policy makers are increasingly encouraging comparative effectiveness research. Little is known regarding comparative studies among children with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft lip and/or palate profoundly influences self-perception and social functioning, and patient-reported outcomes provide a unique perspective on the success of reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding patient-reported outcomes among patients with cleft lip and/or palate.

METHODS

The authors reviewed articles from MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo that examined the use of patient-reported outcome instruments for cleft lip and/or palate. Studies of patients with cleft lip and/or palate across any age that described the use of patient-completed measures in patient and control populations were included. A research librarian confirmed the search, and two independent, blinded reviewers performed full-text review.

RESULTS

The authors identified 1979 articles and selected 30 for inclusion. Forty-two different assessment tools were used to analyze factors such as self-esteem, behavior, and social support. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire was most commonly used (n = 7), followed by the Childhood Experience Questionnaire (n = 5), and the Satisfaction with Appearance survey (n = 4). Barriers to analysis included lack of standardization of survey administration, effect of publication bias, and variations in patient populations between individual studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparative studies of patient-reported outcomes among patients with cleft lip and/or palate are infrequent. Many instruments exist to measure patient-reported outcomes in this population, but no specific standard exists. Identifying efficient and targeted forms of instrument selection and administration will enhance comparative studies among children with cleft lip and/or palate.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, III.

Для цитирования: Ranganathan Kavitha, Vercler Christian J, Warschausky Seth A, MacEachern Mark P, Buchman Steven R, Waljee Jennifer F. Comparative effectiveness studies examining patient-reported outcomes among children with cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000000825.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.