MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10067-018-4361-2

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical rheumatology · 2018

Treatment options for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome in children and adults: a narrative review.

Gaggiano Carla, Rigante Donato, Sota Jurgen, Grosso Salvatore, Cantarini Luca

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is the most frequent non-hereditary autoinflammatory disorder in childhood: Its onset is usually observed before 5 years, though reports regarding adulthood are increasing. The pathogenesis of the syndrome is not completely understood, but a multifactorial origin, probably based on a polygenic pattern of susceptibility, is the most probable rational pathogenetic hypothesis. Treatment of PFAPA syndrome relies on the administration of low-dose corticosteroids, which promptly abort flares but cannot prevent subsequent disease episodes over time. Tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy has proved to be successful in some pediatric patients, as proven by different studies. On the other hand, colchicine, cimetidine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and interleukin-1 inhibitors have shown efficacy, which require further definite confirmations. This review is aimed at summarizing all the recent evidence about treatment options available for PFAPA syndrome both in pediatric and adult patients.

Для цитирования: Gaggiano Carla, Rigante Donato, Sota Jurgen, Grosso Salvatore, Cantarini Luca. Treatment options for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome in children and adults: a narrative review.. Clinical rheumatology. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4361-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.