Scottish medical journal · 2014
Socioeconomic influence on orofacial cleft patient care.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smillie I, Yong K, Harris K, Wynne D M, Russell C J H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate is the most common craniofacial birth defect in the UK. Orofacial clefts have functional and aesthetic implications requiring intensive multi-disciplinary follow-up to optimise development. Failure to attend follow-up is likely to have a negative impact on patient outcomes. The aim of this retrospective audit is to establish if socioeconomic status influences attendance, DNA and cancellation rates in cleft patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective audit of 74 orofacial cleft patients born and operated on at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children Glasgow between 2006 and 2007. There was higher rate of DNA in more deprived social groups-21% (SIMD 1) against 10% (SIMD 5). A higher rate of DNA in cleft lip and palate patients was noted. This group of patients showed a marked difference in attendance between SIMD 1 (38%) and SIMD 5 (78%).
CONCLUSION: More deprived areas have a higher outpatient DNA rate for cleft patients resulting in suboptimal follow-up. Ultimately, causation of poorer outcomes in this group is likely to be multi-factorial but the financial implication of travelling to multiple clinics should be considered and it may be that resource reallocation is the answer to address the current inequality of health care provision.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective audit of 74 orofacial cleft patients born and operated on at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children Glasgow between 2006 and 2007. There was higher rate of DNA in more deprived social groups-21% (SIMD 1) against 10% (SIMD 5). A higher rate of DNA in cleft lip and palate patients was noted. This group of patients showed a marked difference in attendance between SIMD 1 (38%) and SIMD 5 (78%).
CONCLUSION: More deprived areas have a higher outpatient DNA rate for cleft patients resulting in suboptimal follow-up. Ultimately, causation of poorer outcomes in this group is likely to be multi-factorial but the financial implication of travelling to multiple clinics should be considered and it may be that resource reallocation is the answer to address the current inequality of health care provision.