MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mej.0b013e3283449119

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2011

Do we routinely need cranial computed tomography for mild head injuries in Turkey?

Yavaşi Ozcan, Unlüer Erol Erden, Gün Cem, Sağlam Caner, Kayayurt Kamil, Kiliç Turgay Yilmaz, Kara Pinar Hanife, Vandenberk Nergiz

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The objectives of this study were to determine the role of clinical parameters in detecting intracranial injury and to find out whether cranial computed tomography (CT) is routinely needed for mild head injury (MHI) in Turkey. This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing the records of patients with MHI who underwent cranial CT in our emergency department. We carried out multiple logistic regression analysis, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated by using SPSS 15.0. This study included 923 patients. Positive cranial CT findings were determined in 17 patients (1.8%) and six of them (0.6%) underwent surgery. Statistically significant correlations were found among headache, presence of clinical findings of skull fracture, focal neurological deficit and positive cranial CT findings. Although the incidence of the intracranial lesions, especially those requiring surgery, is low in MHI, the liberal use of CT scanning in MHI seems to be justified in countries such as Turkey.

Для цитирования: Yavaşi Ozcan, Unlüer Erol Erden, Gün Cem, Sağlam Caner, Kayayurt Kamil, Kiliç Turgay Yilmaz, Kara Pinar Hanife, Vandenberk Nergiz. Do we routinely need cranial computed tomography for mild head injuries in Turkey?. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/mej.0b013e3283449119.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.