Zhonghua yi xue yi chuan xue za zhi = Zhonghua yixue yichuanxue zazhi = Chinese journal of medical genetics · 2014
[Analysis of 22 patients with congenital cleft lip and palate using high-resolution chromosome microarray].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lei Tingying, Zhang Ying, Wang Hongtao, Li Fan, Cui Yingqiu, Fu Fang, Li Ru, Xie Guie, Zhang Yongling, Liao Can
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) for identifying the etiology of patients with congenital cleft lip and palate.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients with no identifiable chromosomal aberrations by conventional cytogenetic technique were selected. DNA was extracted and hybridized with Affymetrix CytoScan(TM) HD arrays following the manufacturer's protocol. The data were analyzed with a CHAS v2.0 software.
RESULTS: CMA analysis has identified submicroscopic copy number variants (CNVs) in all of the cases, which have ranged from 100 kb to 1.8 Mb. Potential pathogenic CNVs were identified in 5 patients (22.7%), which involved microdeletions and microduplications on 8p23.1, 10q22.2-q22.3, 6q26, 20p12.1 and 18q12.3. MYST4, MACROD2 and SOX7 genes are likely the causative genes.
CONCLUSION: CMA is an effective method for identification of etiology in patients with cleft lip and palate. CMA should be provided for patients with cleft lip and palate but a normal karyotype. Especially for those with additional structural abnormalities, there is a high risk for submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients with no identifiable chromosomal aberrations by conventional cytogenetic technique were selected. DNA was extracted and hybridized with Affymetrix CytoScan(TM) HD arrays following the manufacturer's protocol. The data were analyzed with a CHAS v2.0 software.
RESULTS: CMA analysis has identified submicroscopic copy number variants (CNVs) in all of the cases, which have ranged from 100 kb to 1.8 Mb. Potential pathogenic CNVs were identified in 5 patients (22.7%), which involved microdeletions and microduplications on 8p23.1, 10q22.2-q22.3, 6q26, 20p12.1 and 18q12.3. MYST4, MACROD2 and SOX7 genes are likely the causative genes.
CONCLUSION: CMA is an effective method for identification of etiology in patients with cleft lip and palate. CMA should be provided for patients with cleft lip and palate but a normal karyotype. Especially for those with additional structural abnormalities, there is a high risk for submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations.