[Utility of cardiac event recorders in diagnosing arrhythmic etiology of palpitations in patients without structural heart disease].

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic yield of transtelephonic event monitors for identifying the reason for palpitations in patients with no structural heart disease.

PATIENTS AND METHOD: For 20 months we enrolled all patients reporting palpitations in whom heart disease had been ruled out by medical history, physical examination, ECG and transthoracic echocardiography. All patients underwent 24 h Holter monitoring, which did not provide diagnostic information. Later, a Cardiotest 4DM transtelephonic event monitor was provided to each patient for a mean of 15 3 days. We used SPSS V 10 for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients were enrolled. Mean age was 45 3 years (range 12-85); 167 were females (74%). Two hundred twelve of the 227 patients (93.3%) experienced palpitations while wearing the device, and 210 (92.5%) used the monitor correctly, recording the cardiac rhythm during palpitations. Fifteen patients (6.6%) had no palpitations during the days of study. In 125 (55%) the Cardiotest 4DM correctly recorded and transmitted arrhythmia that justified the patients' reference to palpitations. In 35 (15.4%) significant arrhythmia was detected: paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in 21, atrial fibrillation in 9, atrial flutter in 5, runs of ventricular extrasystoles in 4 and right outflow tract ventricular tachycardia in 1. Sinus rhythm was recorded during palpitations in 85 patients (37%), and arrhythmia as the cause could be ruled out.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiotest 4DM identifies arrhythmia in a very high proportion of patients with palpitations and no structural heart disease.