DOI 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001209
Ascites in Children: A Single-Center Experience of 27 Years.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The aim of our study was to describe the changing prevalence, demographic features, etiologies, and treatment of ascites in children hospitalized during a 27-year period at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, MD).
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed discharges from 1983 to 2010 to select patients whose records included a diagnosis of ascites. We assessed the etiologies and degrees of ascites (ascites grade 1 detectable only by radiologic tests; ascites grades 2 and 3 recognized by moderate and marked abdominal distension by physical examinations).
RESULTS
We classified 518 children into 9 etiology groups: intrahepatic disease (IH) (105), hepatic vein outflow obstruction (HVOO) (45), congestive heart disease (CH) (33), nephrotic syndrome (NS) (36), pancreatitis (26), inflammatory and infectious diseases (77), malignancy (49), idiopathic (71), and miscellaneous (76). IH and CH were predominant in the younger age group (0-5 years) versus HVOO, pancreatitis, and malignancy in the older age group (13-21 years) (P < 0.001). The prevalence of ascites increased over time from 1983 to 2006 and declined thereafter. Ascites grade 1 was more common than ascites grades 2 and 3 in all the groups (P = 0.048). IH and NS were more likely to have ascites grade 2 and 3 (P = 0.02). Although spironolactone was more frequently used in the IH group versus other etiologies, furosemide was used more frequently in NS and CH versus other etiologies (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The increased prevalence of ascites during the initial study period could reflect improved detection radiologic detection. The proportion of severe ascites and the various medical treatments differed among the etiologic groups.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.