MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1249/00005768-199406000-00019

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 1994

Responses to preferred intensities of exertion in men differing in activity levels.

Dishman R K, Farquhar R P, Cureton K J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We compared ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), state anxiety, percentage of peak oxygen uptake (% VO2peak), percentage of ventilatory threshold (% Tvent), and blood lactate concentration [HLa] in 11 high-active and 12 low-active men (23 +/- 3 yr) at self-selected power outputs during 20 min of cycling. The high-active group selected higher power outputs than did the low-active group, but % VO2peak and % Tvent were lower for the high-active subjects during the initial 5-10 min of cycling. Both groups reported increased RPE across time, but contrary to past studies of load-incremented cycling, RPE was identical for the groups despite their differences in relative intensity. No differences were found for [HLa] or state anxiety during cycling. The groups did not differ on exertional symptoms, but the high-active subjects reported a significant reduction in state anxiety immediately after cycling. A preferred exertion protocol provides an alternative approach to identifying influences on perceived exertion during prolonged exercise. The influence of physical activity history/status on the association between the concomitant pattern of self-selected power outputs and postexercise anxiety reduction merits study.

Для цитирования: Dishman R K, Farquhar R P, Cureton K J. Responses to preferred intensities of exertion in men differing in activity levels.. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 1994. DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199406000-00019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.