Medicine · 2019
The effectiveness of air-free warming systems on perioperative hypothermia in total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Shuyan, Pan Yu, Zhao Qiancong, Feng Wendy, Han Hongyu, Pan Zhenxiang, Sun Qianchuang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypothermia is a common and serious complication during surgery. Different warming systems are used to prevent perioperative hypothermia. However, there have been no previous meta-analyses of the effectiveness of air-free warming systems on perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty.
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to August 2018. These RCTs compared the effects of air-free warming with forced-air (FA) warming system in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty. Postoperative temperature, core temperature during surgery, thermal comfort, blood loss and incidence of shivering and hypothermia were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 287 patients from 6 clinical studies were included in the analysis. In summary, there was no significant difference in the postoperative temperature (WMD -0.043, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.23, P = .758) between the air-free warming and FA warming groups. No statistical difference (WMD 0.058, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.22, P = .475) was found in core temperatures at 0 minutes during surgery between the air-free warming and FA warming groups. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference in thermal comfort, blood loss or incidence of shivering and hypothermia between the air-free warming and FA warming groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Air-free warming system was as effective as FA warming system in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty.
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to August 2018. These RCTs compared the effects of air-free warming with forced-air (FA) warming system in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty. Postoperative temperature, core temperature during surgery, thermal comfort, blood loss and incidence of shivering and hypothermia were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 287 patients from 6 clinical studies were included in the analysis. In summary, there was no significant difference in the postoperative temperature (WMD -0.043, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.23, P = .758) between the air-free warming and FA warming groups. No statistical difference (WMD 0.058, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.22, P = .475) was found in core temperatures at 0 minutes during surgery between the air-free warming and FA warming groups. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference in thermal comfort, blood loss or incidence of shivering and hypothermia between the air-free warming and FA warming groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Air-free warming system was as effective as FA warming system in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty.