Nuclear medicine communications · 2011
Correlation of various published radionuclide glomerular filtration rate estimation techniques and proposed paediatric normative data.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bhatt Manoj K, Bartlett Marissa L, Mallitt Kylie-Ann, McTaggart Steven, Ravi Kumar Aravind S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the comparability and interchangeability of the radionuclide glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using different published techniques, and propose normative data for paediatrics.
METHODS: A total of 476 paediatric oncology patients aged 2-17 years, referred between January 2001 and December 2008 for GFR estimation, were reviewed for any potential cause of renal impairment. Sixty-nine patients met the stringent inclusion criteria, and were included in the study. GFR estimation was carried out using either technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (⁹⁹mTc-DTPA) or chromium-51 EDTA (⁵¹Cr-EDTA). Multiple GFR results were calculated from the same blood sample data (counts/min/ml), according to previously published GFR estimation techniques using one to three blood samples. These techniques were slope-intercept, slope-only and half life. For slope-intercept techniques, GFR was normalized to body surface area or extracellular fluid volume.
RESULTS: The GFR values obtained using different techniques were highly variant. The intraclass correlation (ICC) for different methods was moderate (ICC=0.56-0.66). A reliable empiric formula to allow conversion of GFR values from one technique to another could not be derived because of this variability, with some exceptions. ⁵¹Cr-EDTA yielded the same or lower variability than ⁹⁹mTc-DTPA. The British Nuclear Medicine Society-recommended method had the lowest coefficient of variation, with a mean value of 116 (SD 22) normalized to 1.73 m² for ⁵¹Cr-EDTA using two samples.
CONCLUSION: The GFR values obtained from different calculation techniques are not readily interchangeable or comparable, with some exceptions. For both ⁹⁹mTc-DTPA and ⁵¹Cr-EDTA, the British Nuclear Medicine Society-recommended technique appears to be the most robust, with the least coefficient of variation.
METHODS: A total of 476 paediatric oncology patients aged 2-17 years, referred between January 2001 and December 2008 for GFR estimation, were reviewed for any potential cause of renal impairment. Sixty-nine patients met the stringent inclusion criteria, and were included in the study. GFR estimation was carried out using either technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (⁹⁹mTc-DTPA) or chromium-51 EDTA (⁵¹Cr-EDTA). Multiple GFR results were calculated from the same blood sample data (counts/min/ml), according to previously published GFR estimation techniques using one to three blood samples. These techniques were slope-intercept, slope-only and half life. For slope-intercept techniques, GFR was normalized to body surface area or extracellular fluid volume.
RESULTS: The GFR values obtained using different techniques were highly variant. The intraclass correlation (ICC) for different methods was moderate (ICC=0.56-0.66). A reliable empiric formula to allow conversion of GFR values from one technique to another could not be derived because of this variability, with some exceptions. ⁵¹Cr-EDTA yielded the same or lower variability than ⁹⁹mTc-DTPA. The British Nuclear Medicine Society-recommended method had the lowest coefficient of variation, with a mean value of 116 (SD 22) normalized to 1.73 m² for ⁵¹Cr-EDTA using two samples.
CONCLUSION: The GFR values obtained from different calculation techniques are not readily interchangeable or comparable, with some exceptions. For both ⁹⁹mTc-DTPA and ⁵¹Cr-EDTA, the British Nuclear Medicine Society-recommended technique appears to be the most robust, with the least coefficient of variation.