The Science of the total environment · 2025
Investigation of biogeochemical landfill covers incorporating different biochars and alkaline industrial byproducts for landfill gas mitigation: A column experiment study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Verma Gaurav, Reddy Krishna R, Green Stefan J
Аннотация
Fugitive emissions of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills pose significant environmental risks if not captured. To address this, researchers at the University of Illinois Chicago developed a biogeochemical cover (BGCC) comprising a biochar-amended soil (BAS) layer and a basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag layer to simultaneously mitigate CH4 and CO2. Previous laboratory experiments with BGCC comprising pinewood-derived biochar (PW)-amended soil and BOF slag (BGCC-PWBOF) demonstrated substantial potential for CH4 and CO2 mitigation. However, reliance on PW biochar and BOF slag may face challenges due to limited availability near landfill site location, which motivated the investigation of BGCC, which consists of different biochar and alkaline materials. Therefore, this study compared two BGCC configurations-one with rice husk biochar and cement kiln dust (BGCC-RHCKD) and another with pinewood biochar and BOF slag (BGCC-PWBOF)-against a conventional soil cover (SC) system in a laboratory column experiment. All three covers were exposed to synthetic landfill gas across four phases with varying CH4 influx rates. Surface emissions and gas concentrations were continuously monitored. After the experiment, the covers were dismantled, and samples from multiple depths were collected for physico-chemical characterization, microbial community analysis, and batch tests to determine CH4 oxidation rates and residual carbonation capacity. Results showed that under moderate CH4 influx rates (20.77-22.80 g CH4/m2-day) in Phase 1, BGCC-RHCKD and SC achieved peak CH4 removal efficiencies of 67.3 % and 74.2 %, respectively. The CKD layer in BGCC-RHCKD maintained 100 % CO2 removal across all phases without breakthrough, whereas BOF slag in BGCC-PWBOF experienced breakthrough after 16-22 days due to desiccation. The highest CH4 oxidation rates reached 2042.8 μg CH4/g-day (BGCC-RHCKD), 455.3 μg CH4/g-day (BGCC-PWBOF), and 372.1 μg CH4/g-day (SC) and were strongly correlated with the relative abundance of methylotrophic bacteria, especially Methylobacter luteus, in 16S rRNA gene amplicon profiles. Overall, the BGCC-RHCKD system offers an effective solution for mitigating both CH₄ and CO₂ emissions, while the SC system is effective for CH₄ emissions.