Pediatric emergency care · 2022
Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings in Children Presenting With Shock to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Rwanda.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Lei, Mutabandama Yves, McCall Natalie, Umuhoza Christian
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Shock remains a leading proximate cause of death in children. Children in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries present with shock from a wide range of pathologies. Routine physiologic parameters may not reflect underlying physiology. No previous work has systematically described ultrasound findings in children with shock in an SSA country. We set out to perform focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) on children with shock in Rwanda and describe the findings in this pilot study.
METHODS: In a prospective descriptive study, we trained pediatric residents to perform FOCUS on children presenting with shock to an urban tertiary care pediatric emergency department in Kigali, Rwanda. Images were transmitted via cellphone network and reviewed by experts. Primary outcome was expert's description of the FOCUS findings. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 48-hour, change in assessment and treatment after FOCUS, and agreement of FOCUS findings between residents and experts.
RESULTS: Between January 2020 and April 2020, 25 subjects were enrolled by 8 residents. Eleven of 25 (44%) were newly diagnosed with acquired or congenital heart disease. The 48-hour mortality rate was higher in this group compared with those without heart disease (8 of 11 vs 1 of 14). The resident reported changing assessment and treatment based on FOCUS findings in 60% of patients (15 of 25). There was good to excellent agreements between residents and FOCUS experts on left ventricle function, pericardial effusion, and intravascular volume.
CONCLUSIONS: In children presenting with signs and symptoms of shock in SSA, one could perform a screening FOCUS to distinguish between hypovolemic and cardiogenic shock.
METHODS: In a prospective descriptive study, we trained pediatric residents to perform FOCUS on children presenting with shock to an urban tertiary care pediatric emergency department in Kigali, Rwanda. Images were transmitted via cellphone network and reviewed by experts. Primary outcome was expert's description of the FOCUS findings. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 48-hour, change in assessment and treatment after FOCUS, and agreement of FOCUS findings between residents and experts.
RESULTS: Between January 2020 and April 2020, 25 subjects were enrolled by 8 residents. Eleven of 25 (44%) were newly diagnosed with acquired or congenital heart disease. The 48-hour mortality rate was higher in this group compared with those without heart disease (8 of 11 vs 1 of 14). The resident reported changing assessment and treatment based on FOCUS findings in 60% of patients (15 of 25). There was good to excellent agreements between residents and FOCUS experts on left ventricle function, pericardial effusion, and intravascular volume.
CONCLUSIONS: In children presenting with signs and symptoms of shock in SSA, one could perform a screening FOCUS to distinguish between hypovolemic and cardiogenic shock.