Continuous Electroencephalogram and Antiseizure Medication Use in an International Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Population.

BACKGROUND

Electrographic seizures are frequent and associated with worse outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite this, the use of continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) remains low. Our study describes cEEG usage and treatment dosing antiseizure medications (ASMs) in an international pediatric TBI population, hypothesizing that children monitored with cEEG have an increased rate of treatment ASMs because of electrographic seizure detection, compared with children who are not monitored with cEEG.

METHODS

This subanalysis of the TBI cohort of the international PANGEA study included children, 7 days to 17 years of age, with acute neurological insults admitted to pediatric intensive care units. We analyzed demographics, injury severity, and therapies including prophylactic or treatment ASMs. We evaluated the relationships between cEEG use, seizure frequency, and receipt of treatment ASMs. [Formula: see text] or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze categorical variables, and the Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney U-test was used for continuous variables. Multivariable analysis for treatment ASM use was performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred-twenty-three of 174 patients with TBI were included. Twenty-seven patients (21.9%) underwent cEEG at any point during pediatric intensive care unit admission. Preexisting seizure disorder (18.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.014) and neuromuscular blockade use (52.4% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.011) were more frequently observed in the group monitored on cEEG when compared with those that were not. Presenting median Glasgow Coma Scale score was worse in the cEEG group (7 vs. 9, p = 0.044). There was no significant difference in age, use of intracranial pressure monitoring, or hyperosmolar therapy between the cEEG monitored and nonmonitored groups. Patients who were monitored on cEEG were more likely to receive a treatment dose ASM than those without cEEG monitoring (66.7% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.0002). When compared with those without treatment ASM, the treatment ASM group had more electrographic seizures on their first electroencephalogram following injury (51.6% vs. 4%, p = 0.0001) and more clinical seizures (55.8% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Children monitored with cEEG after TBI have an increased prescription of treatment ASMs and clinical and electrographic seizures. The increased rate of treatment ASMs in the cEEG group may indicate increased recognition of electrographic seizures.