Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2015
Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Guanfacine in Pediatric Patients.
Клиническое исследование I фазыКлиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Knebel William, Corcoran Mary, Ermer James, Gastonguay Marc R
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The population pharmacokinetics of guanfacine extended release were characterized in pediatric patients aged 6-17 years using NONMEM and evaluated by predictive check and bootstrap.
METHODS: Data were described using a one-compartment model. A covariate modeling approach that emphasized parameter estimation rather than stepwise hypothesis testing was implemented. A nonparametric bootstrap procedure and a predictive check method were used to evaluate the final model and parameter estimates.
RESULTS: Typical population pharmacokinetic parameters (95 % confidence interval), given the reference covariates (Caucasian, male, age 12 years, weight 50 kg), were 33.1 (30.2-36.4) L/h for apparent clearance (CL/F), 804 (703-900) L for apparent volume of distribution, 0.552 (0.437-0.670) h(-1) for the absorption rate constant, and 0.651 (0.608-0.697) h for absorption lag time.
DISCUSSION: The pharmacokinetics of guanfacine are similar in pediatric patients compared with adults when appropriately scaled by patient weight. The main predictor of guanfacine exposure, as determined by a change in CL/F, was weight. Effects of the other covariates (age, sex, and race) on CL/F were estimated with reasonable precision; however, the additional effects of age, sex, and race can be considered to have little to no clinical relevance.
METHODS: Data were described using a one-compartment model. A covariate modeling approach that emphasized parameter estimation rather than stepwise hypothesis testing was implemented. A nonparametric bootstrap procedure and a predictive check method were used to evaluate the final model and parameter estimates.
RESULTS: Typical population pharmacokinetic parameters (95 % confidence interval), given the reference covariates (Caucasian, male, age 12 years, weight 50 kg), were 33.1 (30.2-36.4) L/h for apparent clearance (CL/F), 804 (703-900) L for apparent volume of distribution, 0.552 (0.437-0.670) h(-1) for the absorption rate constant, and 0.651 (0.608-0.697) h for absorption lag time.
DISCUSSION: The pharmacokinetics of guanfacine are similar in pediatric patients compared with adults when appropriately scaled by patient weight. The main predictor of guanfacine exposure, as determined by a change in CL/F, was weight. Effects of the other covariates (age, sex, and race) on CL/F were estimated with reasonable precision; however, the additional effects of age, sex, and race can be considered to have little to no clinical relevance.