DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.028
Delivered dose-effect analysis of radiation induced rib fractures after thoracic SBRT.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anatomical changes during the stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may cause the delivered dose to deviate from the planned dose. We investigate if normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models based on the delivered dose predict radiation-induced rib fractures better than models based on the planned dose.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
437 NSCLC patients treated to a median dose of 3x18 Gy were included. Delivered dose was estimated by accumulating EQD2-corrected fraction doses after being deformed with daily CBCT-to-planning CT deformable image registration. Dosimetric parameters Dx (dose to a relative volume x) were extracted for each rib included in the CBCTs field-of-view. An NTCP model was constructed for both planned and delivered dose, optimizing the parameters TD50 (dose with 50% toxicity risk), m (steepness of the curve) and x, using maximum likelihood estimation. Best NTCP model was determined using Akaike weights (Aw). Differences between the models were tested for significance using the Vuong's test.
RESULTS
Median time to fracture of 110 fractured ribs was 22.5 months. The maximum rib dose, D0, best predicted fractures for both planned and delivered dose. The average delivered D0 was significantly lower than planned (p < 0.001). NTCP model based on the delivered D0 was the best, with Aw = 0.95. The models were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION
Delivered maximum dose to the ribs was significantly lower than planned. The NTCP model based on delivered dose improved predictions of radiation-induced rib fractures but did not reach statistical significance.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.