Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2014
Rate-control drugs affect variability and irregularity measures of RR intervals in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Corino Valentina D A, Ulimoen Sara R, Enger Steve, Mainardi Luca T, Tveit Arnljot, Platonov Pyotr G
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Irregularity measures have been suggested as risk indicators in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, it is not known to what extent they are affected by commonly used rate-control drugs. We aimed at evaluating the effect of metoprolol, carvedilol, diltiazem, and verapamil on the variability and irregularity of the ventricular response in patients with permanent AF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with permanent AF were part of an investigator-blind cross-over study, comparing 4 rate-control drugs (diltiazem, verapamil, metoprolol, and carvedilol). We analyzed five 20-minute segments per patient: baseline and the 4 drug regimens. On every segment, heart rate (HR) variability and irregularity of RR series were computed. The variability was assessed as standard deviation, pNN20, pNN50, pNN80, and rMSSD. The irregularity was assessed by regularity index, approximate (ApEn), and sample entropy. A significantly lower HR was obtained with all drugs, the HR was lowest using the calcium channel blockers. All drugs increased the variability of ventricular response in respect to baseline (as an example, rMSSD: baseline 171 ± 47 milliseconds, carvedilol 229 ± 58 milliseconds; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, metoprolol 226 ± 66 milliseconds; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, verapamil 228 ± 84; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, diltiazem 256 ± 87 milliseconds; P < 0.05 vs. baseline and all other drugs). Only β-blockers significantly increased the irregularity of the RR series (as an example, ApEn: baseline 1.86 ± 0.13, carvedilol 1.92 ± 0.09; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, metoprolol 1.93 ± 0.08; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, verapamil 1.86 ± 0.22 ns, diltiazem 1.88 ± 0.16 ns).
CONCLUSION: Modification of AV node conduction by rate-control drugs increase RR variability, while only β-blockers affect irregularity.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with permanent AF were part of an investigator-blind cross-over study, comparing 4 rate-control drugs (diltiazem, verapamil, metoprolol, and carvedilol). We analyzed five 20-minute segments per patient: baseline and the 4 drug regimens. On every segment, heart rate (HR) variability and irregularity of RR series were computed. The variability was assessed as standard deviation, pNN20, pNN50, pNN80, and rMSSD. The irregularity was assessed by regularity index, approximate (ApEn), and sample entropy. A significantly lower HR was obtained with all drugs, the HR was lowest using the calcium channel blockers. All drugs increased the variability of ventricular response in respect to baseline (as an example, rMSSD: baseline 171 ± 47 milliseconds, carvedilol 229 ± 58 milliseconds; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, metoprolol 226 ± 66 milliseconds; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, verapamil 228 ± 84; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, diltiazem 256 ± 87 milliseconds; P < 0.05 vs. baseline and all other drugs). Only β-blockers significantly increased the irregularity of the RR series (as an example, ApEn: baseline 1.86 ± 0.13, carvedilol 1.92 ± 0.09; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, metoprolol 1.93 ± 0.08; P < 0.05 vs. baseline, verapamil 1.86 ± 0.22 ns, diltiazem 1.88 ± 0.16 ns).
CONCLUSION: Modification of AV node conduction by rate-control drugs increase RR variability, while only β-blockers affect irregularity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAtrial FibrillationCalcium Channel BlockersCarbazolesCarvedilolCross-Over StudiesDiltiazemElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHumansMaleMetoprololMiddle AgedNorwayPropanolaminesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVerapamil