MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3358/shokueishi.56.31

Медицинская библиотека · Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan · 2015

[Validation study of analysis of Malachite green in broiled eels (Kabayaki) by LC-MS/MS].

Yamashita Takeshi, Nishikawa Kiyofumi, Shinozaki Fumiyoshi, Banno Yukinori, Kawakami Masahiro

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

An improved method for analysis of Malachite green (MG) and its metabolite, Leucomalachite green (LMG), in broiled eels without using dichloromethane was developed. This method was evaluated by means of recovery tests according to the guideline for validation of analytical methods by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. MG and LMG were extracted from spiked samples with acetonitrile and citric acid/disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer solution, and were salted-out with sodium chloride. The acetonitrile layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and purified on C18 and strongly acidic cation exchange columns. MG and LMG in the purified solution were determined quantitatively using LC-MS/MS by the internal standard method with surrogates, MG and LMG labeled with deuterium (MG-d5, LMG-d6). The recovery rates of MG and LMG were 99.2% and 93.6%, respectively. The relative standard deviations of repeatability were 2.2% for MG and 4.4% for LMG, and the relative standard deviations of within-laboratory reproducibility were 3.5% for MG and 5.1% for LMG.

Для цитирования: Yamashita Takeshi, Nishikawa Kiyofumi, Shinozaki Fumiyoshi, Banno Yukinori, Kawakami Masahiro. [Validation study of analysis of Malachite green in broiled eels (Kabayaki) by LC-MS/MS].. Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan. 2015. DOI: 10.3358/shokueishi.56.31.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.