MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0022219410392043

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of learning disabilities · 2011

Students with reading and spelling disabilities: peer groups and educational attainment in secondary education.

Kiuru Noona, Haverinen Kaisa, Salmela-Aro Katariina, Nurmi Jari-Erik, Savolainen Hannu, Holopainen Leena

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The present study investigated whether the members of adolescents' peer groups are similar in reading and spelling disabilities and whether this similarity contributes to subsequent school achievement and educational attainment. The sample consisted of 375 Finnish adolescents whose reading and spelling disabilities were assessed at age 16 with the Finnish dyslexia screening test. The students also completed a sociometric nomination measure that was used to identify their peer groups. Register information on participants' school grades also was available, and educational attainment in secondary education was recorded 5 years after completion of the 9 years of basic education. The results revealed that the members of adolescent peer groups resembled each other in reading disabilities but not in those of spelling. Reading disabilities and academic achievement shared within the peer group also contributed to educational attainment in secondary education. Finally, reading disabilities played a larger role in educational attainment among males than among females.

Для цитирования: Kiuru Noona, Haverinen Kaisa, Salmela-Aro Katariina, Nurmi Jari-Erik, Savolainen Hannu, Holopainen Leena. Students with reading and spelling disabilities: peer groups and educational attainment in secondary education.. Journal of learning disabilities. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0022219410392043.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.