HIV medicine · 2016
Rosuvastatin vs. protease inhibitor switching for hypercholesterolaemia: a randomized trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee F J, Monteiro P, Baker D, Bloch M, Roth N, Finlayson R, Moore R, Hoy J, Martinez E, Carr A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin initiation with those of switching of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/rs) in HIV-1-infected adults with hypercholesterolaemia and increased cardiovascular risk scores.
METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre study, HIV-1-infected adults on PI/r-based therapy with viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, fasting total cholesterol ≥ 5.5 mmol/L (both for ≥ 6 months) and elevated cardiovascular risk (Framingham score ≥ 8% or diabetes or family history), and not on lipid-lowering therapy, were randomized to open-label rosuvastatin 10 mg/day or to PI/r switching, both with standardized diet/exercise advice. The primary endpoint was change in total cholesterol at week 12 (intention to treat).
RESULTS: There were 43 participants (23 on rosuvastatin). Baseline characteristics were: mean [± standard deviation (SD)] age 55 (8.5) years, 42 (98%) male, 41 (95%) white race, and mean (± SD) total cholesterol 6.2 (1.2) mmol/L. At enrolment, PI/rs were lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 22; 51%), atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 12; 28%) and darunavir/ritonavir (n = 9; 21%). The commonest PI/r substitutes were raltegravir (n = 9; 45%) and rilpivirine (n = 4; 20%). All participants were adherent through to week 12. Rosuvastatin yielded greater declines than PI/r switching in total (- 21.4% vs. - 8.7%, respectively; P = 0.003) and low-density lipoprotein (- 29.9% vs. - 1.0%, respectively; P < 0.001) cholesterol, but smaller declines in very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides (P < 0.01). Cholesterol lowering was greater in participants on atazanavir/ritonavir or once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (vs. lopinavir/ritonavir). More study drug-related adverse events (mostly grade 1 nausea/diarrhoea; 10 vs. one, respectively; P = 0.001) occurred with PI/r switching than with rosuvastatin.
CONCLUSIONS: In adults receiving a PI/r, rosuvastatin 10 mg/day for 12 weeks yielded larger decreases in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol than PI/r switching, and was better tolerated.
METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre study, HIV-1-infected adults on PI/r-based therapy with viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, fasting total cholesterol ≥ 5.5 mmol/L (both for ≥ 6 months) and elevated cardiovascular risk (Framingham score ≥ 8% or diabetes or family history), and not on lipid-lowering therapy, were randomized to open-label rosuvastatin 10 mg/day or to PI/r switching, both with standardized diet/exercise advice. The primary endpoint was change in total cholesterol at week 12 (intention to treat).
RESULTS: There were 43 participants (23 on rosuvastatin). Baseline characteristics were: mean [± standard deviation (SD)] age 55 (8.5) years, 42 (98%) male, 41 (95%) white race, and mean (± SD) total cholesterol 6.2 (1.2) mmol/L. At enrolment, PI/rs were lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 22; 51%), atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 12; 28%) and darunavir/ritonavir (n = 9; 21%). The commonest PI/r substitutes were raltegravir (n = 9; 45%) and rilpivirine (n = 4; 20%). All participants were adherent through to week 12. Rosuvastatin yielded greater declines than PI/r switching in total (- 21.4% vs. - 8.7%, respectively; P = 0.003) and low-density lipoprotein (- 29.9% vs. - 1.0%, respectively; P < 0.001) cholesterol, but smaller declines in very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides (P < 0.01). Cholesterol lowering was greater in participants on atazanavir/ritonavir or once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (vs. lopinavir/ritonavir). More study drug-related adverse events (mostly grade 1 nausea/diarrhoea; 10 vs. one, respectively; P = 0.001) occurred with PI/r switching than with rosuvastatin.
CONCLUSIONS: In adults receiving a PI/r, rosuvastatin 10 mg/day for 12 weeks yielded larger decreases in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol than PI/r switching, and was better tolerated.