The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2019
Y-graft modification to the Fontan procedure: Increasingly balanced flow over time.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Trusty Phillip M, Wei Zhenglun, Sales Megan, Kanter Kirk R, Fogel Mark A, Yoganathan Ajit P, Slesnick Timothy C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The use of Y-grafts for Fontan completion is hypothesized to offer more balanced hepatic flow distribution (HFD) and decreased energy losses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of Y-grafts over time using serial cardiac magnetic resonance data and to compare their performance with extracardiac Fontan connections.
METHODS: Ten Fontan patients with commercially available Y-graft connections and serial postoperative cardiac magnetic resonance data were included in this study. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations were used to estimate HFD and energy losses. Y-graft performance was compared with 3 extracardiac conduit Fontan groups (n = 10 for each) whose follow-up times straddle the Y-graft time points.
RESULTS: Y-graft HFD became significantly more balanced over time (deviation from 50% decreased from 18% ± 14% to 8% ± 8%; P = .015). Total cavopulmonary connection resistance did not significantly change. Y-grafts at 3-year follow-up showed more balanced HFD than the extracardiac conduit groups at both the earlier and later follow-up times. Total cavopulmonary connection resistance was not significantly different between any Y-graft or extracardiac conduit group.
CONCLUSIONS: Y-grafts showed significantly more balanced HFD over a 3-year follow-up without an increase in total cavopulmonary connection resistance, and therefore may be a valuable option for Fontan completion. Additional follow-up data at longer follow-up times are still needed to thoroughly characterize the potential advantages of Y-graft use.
METHODS: Ten Fontan patients with commercially available Y-graft connections and serial postoperative cardiac magnetic resonance data were included in this study. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations were used to estimate HFD and energy losses. Y-graft performance was compared with 3 extracardiac conduit Fontan groups (n = 10 for each) whose follow-up times straddle the Y-graft time points.
RESULTS: Y-graft HFD became significantly more balanced over time (deviation from 50% decreased from 18% ± 14% to 8% ± 8%; P = .015). Total cavopulmonary connection resistance did not significantly change. Y-grafts at 3-year follow-up showed more balanced HFD than the extracardiac conduit groups at both the earlier and later follow-up times. Total cavopulmonary connection resistance was not significantly different between any Y-graft or extracardiac conduit group.
CONCLUSIONS: Y-grafts showed significantly more balanced HFD over a 3-year follow-up without an increase in total cavopulmonary connection resistance, and therefore may be a valuable option for Fontan completion. Additional follow-up data at longer follow-up times are still needed to thoroughly characterize the potential advantages of Y-graft use.